Home » Our Enemies and Us: Americas Rivalries and the Making of Political Science by Ido Oren
Our Enemies and Us: Americas Rivalries and the Making of Political Science Ido Oren

Our Enemies and Us: Americas Rivalries and the Making of Political Science

Ido Oren

Published January 30th 2013
ISBN : 9780801478949
Paperback
250 pages
Enter the sum

 About the Book 

Ido Oren challenges American political sciences definition of itself as an objective science attached to democracy. The material Oren unearthed in his research into the disciplines ideological nature may discomfit many: Woodrow Wilsons admirationMoreIdo Oren challenges American political sciences definition of itself as an objective science attached to democracy. The material Oren unearthed in his research into the disciplines ideological nature may discomfit many: Woodrow Wilsons admiration of Prussias efficient bureaucracy- the favorable review of Mein Kampf published in the American Political Science Review- the involvement of political scientists in village pacification and interrogation of Viet Cong prisoners during the Vietnam War. Oren reveals the fervently pro-German views of the founder of the discipline, John W. Burgess, who stated that the Teutonic race was politically superior to all others, and he presents evidence of a long-term, intimate relationship between the discipline and the national security agencies of the U.S. government.Oren documents a systematic pattern of historical change in the disciplines characterization of America and Americas chief enemies (Imperial Germany, Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Stalins Russia). These characterizations, he finds, swing from pre-conflict ideological accommodationism to post-conflict nationalism. Substantial traces of this historical process, in which politics and scholarship intertwine, still remain in the supposedly objective concepts and data sets of contemporary political science. Our Enemies and US is more than an expose, however. Oren urges academics to be more sensitive to the moral ramifications of their work and to reflect on issues fundamental to the identity of political science. The discipline, he says, must take into account the historical position of its own scholarship.